From Engagement Brief to Match in 90 Seconds.
Crewpath runs four independent scoring passes — domain expertise, client chemistry, utilization pressure, bench cost — then composites a ranked list your resource manager can confirm in a single click.
Start with a Retroactive Pilot
Engagement Brief Submitted
The process begins with an engagement brief — entered manually by a resource manager or submitted automatically via PSA webhook when a new project is opened in your system.
Four Dimension Scoring Pass
Four independent scoring algorithms run simultaneously for every consultant in your roster. Each pass evaluates a different signal source. Combined, they produce a composite score that reflects both fit and firm economics.
No black box — every score is explainable down to the input signals that drove it. Partners can inspect any dimension score before confirming.
Ranked Output Generated
Every consultant in your roster receives a composite score. The ranked list is sorted by score and delivered to the resource manager and configured approvers.
Each row shows the overall score plus a per-dimension breakdown. Conflict flags — double-booking, ceiling breach, blacklisted pairing — appear inline.
Crewpath Proposes. Partners Decide.
Crewpath is a decision support tool, not a decision maker. The ranked list is a scored recommendation with full dimension transparency. The partner reviews it, confirms the top match, or selects a different consultant with a reason code captured in the log.
Every override is logged. Monthly calibration reports surface patterns — whether overrides cluster around a particular engagement type, client sector, or seniority band. Over time, override data feeds model recalibration for firms on the Enterprise tier, narrowing the gap between what the model proposes and what partners actually choose.
Score Your Past 12 Months of Allocations
Before committing to a scoring model, see how it would have performed on your firm's actual historical data. Retroactive Audit Mode re-runs the scoring engine against every engagement in your chosen period.
The output shows you where the model's top recommendation agreed with your committee's choice — and where it diverged. Divergence isn't always bad; sometimes it surfaces candidates your committee systematically overlooked.
Start a Retroactive PilotStart with a retroactive pilot.
We run the model against your last 12 months of engagement data. See the divergence report before you commit to anything.
Request Retroactive Pilot